Re: What???? YOU bash the team, I question the Coach
This is really pointless because you continue to dig yourself into a bigger hole but it is enjoyable to watch.
So then Coaching doesn't matter? That is what your above post means? You say that the players do all the work on the court so if they win, lose, shoot well, shoot poor, rebound, don't rebound, turn it over, don't turn it over. etc etc etc that the coach has no bearing on that what so ever?
So Buzz 1st year when he improved the team with basically the same players as the year before that JJ coached that had nothing to do with Buzz being a better coach, it was simply the same players had better years?? So if John Wooden coached the same players that Beth Dunkingberger (or whatever her name was) based on your logic the results would be the exact same? Wooden and Dunkingberger would produce the same results? Is that your argument because that is what you just said?
If in fact that is your argument then clearly you have lost all credibility and should stop posting.
If that is not your post then you will have to explain more clearly.
I thought the whole reason for getting rid of Wolff was that Brooks is a better coach? But now you are saying that despite Wolff having a better year last year then Brooks did this year that the coaching is irrelevant because everything is solely up to the players?
And just to point out again, YOU are bashing the players and saying they are not good enough.
|
(
In response to this post by JRHokie)
Posted: 02/24/2017 at 1:23PM